Have marketers lost control of the message?

Controlling the message and protecting the brand has long been of paramount importance to marketers. But with the phenomenal rise of social media messaging it is being suggested that marketers have now lost control of the message and it is in the hands, or perhaps more accurately fingers and thumbs, of tweeters, bloggers and facebookers.

Some years back talking to the editor of the leading journal in the market served by a recently acquired client who had advertised in that publication for years, I was surprised at the question. "Of course I am very familiar with the brand, but tell me what does your client do?" Of course we addressed this to ensure that all marketing communications associated the brand name with a message or messages that positioned and differentiated the brand. Now it is being said that control and authority for communicating messages about your product is being handed to users. I have always suspected that most contributors to Trip Advisor who give negative reviews have had a poor experience and the web site offers a platform to express that dissatisfaction. Others enthuse extravagantly - in short the middle ground of people who were merely satisfied and found the experience OK seem less motivated to write a review. Many suppliers are now routinely inviting reviews of products, but can still retain control over what appears on their site as customer endorsements.

Social media detaches comment about the company from that control and they may not even see what people are telling each other about their products, so decide to join the conversation and at least be able to respond. One surprising statistic I have seen recently claims 75% of b-2-b brands Twitter compared to just 49% b-2-c brands. Our b-2-b clients range from enthusiasts to join this great new 'conversation' to those steadfastly clinging to the dated notion of guarding every scrap of product information they can reasonably hang on to. But for the adopters there is not much comment, more people busily promoting their own messages with the client's facebook a convenient medium to publish them.

What does seem to be emerging is the importance of using a mixture of channels to communicate the customers and prospects and social media is something else to add to the list.

Does your target audience use Facebook?

Identifying your target audience is no longer just listing job titles.

When developing a market focus for a company it has been traditional to identify target markets and target audiences to then identify the media that address them most efficiently. Because in the b-2-b space the typical media has been the trade press this information drawn from their readership audit is usually job titles, or more helpfully job functions. Marketing communications delivered through these media - display advertising and editorial - can therefore reach the people interested in buying or specifying your products. But in the social media there are other key consideration such as age and interest.

Facebook announced in June that there were now 500 million users and some research suggests 50% check their Facebook account each day. So a massive potential audience. However, although popular with younger people (18-29 have 86% usage) there has also been a big growth amongst the 50+ demographic, doubling in the last year to 42% usage. Broadly user groups with time but not so much cash then and more importantly probably a bit thin on people who are  buying or specifying industrial products. The primary motivation seems to be people driven rather than product driven. It prompts the inevitable question of how people oriented is your product and will enough people in your target user group be so intrigued by your product to become fans. Interestingly the industrial sites that seem to be achieving some measure of success in attracting fans are the portals that are aggregating news. But checking on one such industrial site that also operates a Facebook account shows just 2.1% of monthly site visitors are fans. Of course there are other news delivery options including Twitter which is good for headlines as is RSS and of course e-mail.

In an age of media fragmentation social media needs to be in the marketing mix, but how much resource should be allocated to maintaining a Facebook presence that needs frequent attention? Indeed is there a sufficient flow of quality content to avoid descending into the realm of trivia? Using social media as additional news distribution channels can be managed within a PR programme but developing customer engagement and interaction is more time consuming and an on-going commitment too.   

Is social media a serious marketing tool?

Clients are divided on the role of social media in b-2-b marketing. Now it seems marketing experts are too.

 Marketing Week has thrown a new spanner in the works with an article titled - "Social Media is for people, not  brands". The article challenges whether social media is relevant to big brands and says, "The results, when compared to the industry buzz we keep hearing, simply do not stack up."  The article looks at the top 20 UK brands and offers the fact that some minor celebrity has attracted more followers on Twitter  than all of them together. Some top brands apparently have more tweets than followers and even the more successful  have attracted only around 0.5% of their customer base. The effort and marketing resource to interact with such a small group of customers tends to add support to those of our clients who see social media as at best irrelevant and at worse creating a frivolous image. After all names like Facebook, Twitter and blog hardly sound solid, respectable business ring to thems. Then again the same clients that laugh at the idea of blogs and the rest at one time saw no role for a web site either.

On the other hand a few clients are enthusiastic about Facebook and YouTube and excited about interacting with their customers, sharing pictures and discussing goodness knows what. They see the whole social media phenomenon as  heralding a bright shiny marketing future. These clients happen to be those that love gadgets - their Blackberries, iPhones, apps, net books, lap tops etc - who are avid Facebook users and get excited when they get a message from their favourite brand. Although hardly Luddites, the other group - at present a majority, regard a mobile phone as just that - a telephone - and if they are aware of social media at all do not see it as relevant to their customers. And this is really the bottom line. If even the top brands are pulling in just half of one per cent of their customer base it hardly suggests it is yet a mass marketing tool. Just who are these 0.5% anyway? Are they representative of the other 99.5% or a minority with an unreasonable fascination for a brand, are they the opinion leaders, or totally disillusioned due to poor product experience? Either way does this justify diverting a whole heap of marketing resource? Can we really expect professional buyers to avidly track the latest tweets about nuts and bolts products and bother to comment and volunteer pictures - are they that interested? Do they have the time?. Do these people really want to be 'fans' of a company anyway? 

The fact is we don't really know. What we do know is that using a number of marketing communications tools that are relevant to a company's target audience is effective and now into this mix is added social media. Technical marketing is about analysing the market, then pitching up with an integrated marketing communications plan that addresses the target audience using the most relevant and effective marketing mix.