Marketing this week

Week 37 - week commencing 13th September - a varied week in the life of Technical Marketing and a different type of blog entry this week.

Tuesday a visit to the annual PLASA trade show at Earls Court - now reached by a direct train service that stops off at West Brompton, conveniently located directly across the road from the entrance to the show. No tickets or queues any more, simply key in your pre-registered code on a touch screen and your badge is instantly printed out for immediate scanned entry. Difficult to assess the real success of the show. No doubt the organisers will claim record attendance, but the large areas of screened off and presumably unsold space and thinly populated wide aisles between stands failed to convey the buzz of hectic business activity. Difficult to read the audience profile, more suits in evidence, less of the casually dressed techies of yesteryear and the aging hippies with bald pates and pony tails from the show's disco origins, almost, but not quite a vanishing breed. Sat down with a couple of companies to discuss the differences in marketing collateral that might help successful American brands gain acceptance in the UK. Highlights of stand 'traffic-building' were the aerial artiste (see blog 15th September) and the frequent burst of real flames, the heat from which was apparent on the next stand. See pictures.

An article in IET -'Challenging the establishment' - reported that "normalisation of deviance" was behind the loss of the space shuttle Challenger in 1986 and of the RAF Nimrod over Afghanistan in 2006. What on earth does that mean? Well apparently people - typically managers - get so used to things going OK that have basic flaws, they actually believe they are OK. Or more eloquently, "Normalisation of deviance means that people  within an organisation become so accustomed to a deviant behaviour that they don't consider it a deviant, despite the fact that they exceed their own safety rules by a wide margin. People outside see the situation as deviant whereas the people inside get accustomed to it." Bit like an outside marketing consultant trying to figure out how despite doing all the wrong things, some companies still go on.

Marketing Week today speculates that Google will usurp Coca Cola as top brand, asking  "How long can a 19th-century medicinal tonic head the list of the world’s biggest brands? Or, to put it another way, surely Google’s exemplary brand associations combined with its stranglehold on search in many parts of the world make it a far more valuable asset than a fizzy beverage whose best days are behind it? If you could pick Coke or Google as a future bet, which one would you prefer?" But apparently Google happily breaks the rule of messing around with its logo which changes or is embelished on special days like a shamrock for St Paddy's Day, or last week's dotty display prior to the announcement of Google Instant but that's OK when you are heading for top brand.

A book, " Driving down cost" - by Andrew Wileman identifies as a target for cuts "PR and marketing, or at least advertising and outsourcing", along it has to be said with hiring top firms of accountants and management consultants whose names in the company report impress shareholders and bankers. He asks, "Why not introduce a diktat that all promotional and advertising plans must be slashed by 20 per cent? Until you have tried it how can you tell what effect this may have?". Interestingly Amazon have slashed the price of his book by over 40 per cent from an already modest £14.99 to a bargain £8.47 - perhaps he cut his own advertising budget.

And finally a thought on how the word 'product' seems to have changed in marketing speak.It was prompted by a visit to the Post Office, a place I associate with buying stamps and mailing letters and parcels. So I was a bit surprised when after weighing and measuring a package I was asked if I wanted to buy life assurance. Not so long ago there were product managers whose job was to mastermind new product development and manage a portfolio of products. Products then were solid objects like television sets, light fittings, electric motors. Then the financial sector started talking about products, now the Post Office too it seems, but these were not actually tangible things you could take out of a box, plug in and switch on. No they were things like investments, mortgages, insurance and the concept they were a commodity that could be marketed perhaps led to selling 'products' to unsuitable people. But now it seems products have become things you put in your hair or a beauty treatment and something hairdressers talk about. Perhaps they are the new product managers who use hairdressing merely as a prelude to selling products. I have got a suspicion dentists are going down the same route.